Struktualizm

Structuralism

many of which share the assumption that structural relationships between concepts vary between different cultures/languages and that these relationships can be usefully exposed and explored

More accurately it could be described as an approach in academic disciplines in general that explores the relationships between fundamental principal elements in language, literature, and other fields upon which some higher

Through these networks meaning is produced within a particular person, system, or culture. This meaning then frames and motivates the actions of individuals and groups

Ferdinand de Saussure was the originator of the twentieth century reappearance of structuralism, and evidence of this can be found in Course in General Linguistics,

written by Saussure's colleagues after his death and based on student notes

. Finally, he argued that linguistic signs were composed of two parts, a signifier

(the sound pattern of a word, either in mental projection—as when we silently recite lines from a poem to ourselves—or in actual, physical realization as part of a speech act)

and a signified (the concept or meaning of the word).

and a signified (the concept or meaning of the word).

This was quite different from previous approaches which focused on the relationship between words and the things in the world that they designate.

What is Structuralism?

Structuralism is the name that is given to a wide range of discourses that study underlying structures of signification.

Signification occurs wherever there is a meaningful event or in the practise of some meaningful action.

Hence the phrase, "signifying practices.

A meaningful event might include any of following: writing or reading a text; getting married; having a discussion over a cup of coffee; a battle.

Most (if not all) meaningful events involve either a document or an exchange that can be documented. This would be called a "text."

Texts might include any of the following: a news broadcast; an advertisement; an edition of Shakespeare’s King Lear; the manual for my new washing machine; the wedding vows; a feature film.

From the point of view of structuralism all texts, all meaningful events and all signifying practices can be analysed for their underlying structures.

Such an analysis would reveal the patterns that characterise the system that makes such texts and practices possible.

We cannot see a structure or a system per se. In fact it would be very awkward for us if we were aware at all times of the structures that make our signifying practices possible.

Rather they remain unconscious but necessary aspects of our whole way of being what we are. Structuralism therefore promises to offer insights into what makes us the way we are.

Where does structuralism come from?

Structuralism first comes to prominence as a specific discourse with the work of a Swiss linguist, Ferdinand de Saussure, who developed a branch of linguistics called "Structural Linguistics

Saussure died before he was able to publish his material but we have the meticulously recorded notes of several of his students made during the 2nd course of 1908-1909

The theory was still at a developmental stage then--and has remained in a developmental stage ever after

There is nothing authoritative about Saussure’s theory and even now it is open to debate and controversy.

Yet there has been an extraordinarily diverse and fecund range of work, including a number of schools of thought in Eastern Europe, the United States, and thriving today in Japan, based upon readings of his initial insights as documented by his students

The reconstruction of his lecture courses can be found in The Course in General Linguistics.

This is an essential read for anyone who seriously wants to understand the basis of structuralism and semiotics.

For those who don’t have the time, my summary of basic points follows.

Bear in mind that I am reading with hindsight and have probably added some insights that are in debt to Saussure’s critical heritage.